| 1 |
GSM418013 |
testis_GONSL42 |
10,752 |
NUI Galway |
2009-06-17 |
[cDNA Array] NUIG_salmon_5K array_V2.0 (full array layout) (GPL8731) |
RNA |
Salmo salar
 |
testis |
testis_non-precocious_pool of 10_NP1 testis_precocious_pool of 4_PG3 |
| 2 |
GSM418015 |
testis_GONSL36 |
10,752 |
NUI Galway |
2009-06-17 |
[cDNA Array] NUIG_salmon_5K array_V2.0 (full array layout) (GPL8731) |
RNA |
Salmo salar
 |
testis |
testis_precocious_pool of 4_PG2 testis_non-precocious_pool of 10_NP1 |
| 3 |
GSM418016 |
testis_GONSL34 |
10,752 |
NUI Galway |
2009-06-17 |
[cDNA Array] NUIG_salmon_5K array_V2.0 (full array layout) (GPL8731) |
RNA |
Salmo salar
 |
testis |
testis_precocious_pool of 4_PG1 testis_non-precocious_pool of 10_NP1 |
| 4 |
GSM418014 |
testis_GONSL33 |
10,752 |
NUI Galway |
2009-06-17 |
[cDNA Array] NUIG_salmon_5K array_V2.0 (full array layout) (GPL8731) |
RNA |
Salmo salar
 |
testis |
testis_precocious_pool of 4_PG3 testis_non-precocious_pool of 10_NP2 |
| 5 |
GSM417984 |
testis_GONSL27 |
10,752 |
NUI Galway |
2009-06-17 |
[cDNA Array] NUIG_salmon_5K array_V2.0 (full array layout) (GPL8731) |
RNA |
Salmo salar
 |
testis |
testis_nonprecocious_pool of 10_NP3 testis_precocious_pool of 4_PG2 |
| 6 |
GSM417972 |
testis_GONSL26 |
10,752 |
NUI Galway |
2009-06-17 |
[cDNA Array] NUIG_salmon_5K array_V2.0 (full array layout) (GPL8731) |
RNA |
Salmo salar
 |
testis |
testis_precocious_pool of 4_PG1 testes_non-precocious_pool of 10_NP3 |
| 7 |
GSM417897 |
testis_GONSL21 |
10,752 |
NUI Galway |
2009-06-17 |
[cDNA Array] NUIG_salmon_5K array_V2.0 (full array layout) (GPL8731) |
RNA |
Salmo salar
 |
testis |
testis, pool of 10, non-precocious parr, NP2 testis, pool of 4, precocious parr, PG1 |
| 8 |
GSM418012 |
testes_GONSL29 |
10,752 |
NUI Galway |
2009-06-17 |
[cDNA Array] NUIG_salmon_5K array_V2.0 (full array layout) (GPL8731) |
RNA |
Salmo salar
 |
testis |
testis_precocious_pool of 4_PG3 testis_non-precocious_pool of 10_NP3 |
| 9 |
GSM418011 |
testes_GONSL28 |
10,752 |
NUI Galway |
2009-06-17 |
[cDNA Array] NUIG_salmon_5K array_V2.0 (full array layout) (GPL8731) |
RNA |
Salmo salar
 |
testis |
testis_precocious_pool of 4_PG2 testis_non-precocious_pool of 10_NP2 |
| 10 |
GSM624409 |
LS48R |
11,088 |
NUI Galway |
2010-11-17 |
[Oligo Array] Aquafirst_Trout (GPL11206) |
RNA |
Oncorhynchus mykiss
 |
unclassified |
source_name:REFERENCE LS48 title:LS48R description:The fish used in the study were sexually immature, mixed sex, adult rainbow trout from two lines of fish selectively bred for either a high (HR) or low (LR) corticosteroid response to a standardized confinement stressor. The selection programme used to generate the HR and LR lines of trout has been described previously (Pottinger and Carrick, 1999 and 2001). In brief, single parent matings of individuals identified as either HR or LR by their corticosteroid response to a series of standardized confinement stressors were used to generate F1 lines of HR and LR progeny. An individual-within-family selection process was adopted to establish the F2 and subsequently the F3 generation, used in this study. The F3 generation hatched during spring 2003 and these fish were therefore in their second year (18 months old) at the time of this study. The mean weight and fork length of the two lines at the time of the study was LR: 181 g, 24.7 cm; HR: 185 g, 24.9 cm. |
| 11 |
GSM624408 |
LS48F |
11,088 |
NUI Galway |
2010-11-17 |
[Oligo Array] Aquafirst_Trout (GPL11206) |
RNA |
Oncorhynchus mykiss
 |
unclassified |
source_name:LS48 REFERENCE title:LS48F description:The fish used in the study were sexually immature, mixed sex, adult rainbow trout from two lines of fish selectively bred for either a high (HR) or low (LR) corticosteroid response to a standardized confinement stressor. The selection programme used to generate the HR and LR lines of trout has been described previously (Pottinger and Carrick, 1999 and 2001). In brief, single parent matings of individuals identified as either HR or LR by their corticosteroid response to a series of standardized confinement stressors were used to generate F1 lines of HR and LR progeny. An individual-within-family selection process was adopted to establish the F2 and subsequently the F3 generation, used in this study. The F3 generation hatched during spring 2003 and these fish were therefore in their second year (18 months old) at the time of this study. The mean weight and fork length of the two lines at the time of the study was LR: 181 g, 24.7 cm; HR: 185 g, 24.9 cm. |
| 12 |
GSM624407 |
LS47R |
11,088 |
NUI Galway |
2010-11-17 |
[Oligo Array] Aquafirst_Trout (GPL11206) |
RNA |
Oncorhynchus mykiss
 |
unclassified |
source_name:REFERENCE LS47 title:LS47R description:The fish used in the study were sexually immature, mixed sex, adult rainbow trout from two lines of fish selectively bred for either a high (HR) or low (LR) corticosteroid response to a standardized confinement stressor. The selection programme used to generate the HR and LR lines of trout has been described previously (Pottinger and Carrick, 1999 and 2001). In brief, single parent matings of individuals identified as either HR or LR by their corticosteroid response to a series of standardized confinement stressors were used to generate F1 lines of HR and LR progeny. An individual-within-family selection process was adopted to establish the F2 and subsequently the F3 generation, used in this study. The F3 generation hatched during spring 2003 and these fish were therefore in their second year (18 months old) at the time of this study. The mean weight and fork length of the two lines at the time of the study was LR: 181 g, 24.7 cm; HR: 185 g, 24.9 cm. |
| 13 |
GSM624406 |
LS47F |
11,088 |
NUI Galway |
2010-11-17 |
[Oligo Array] Aquafirst_Trout (GPL11206) |
RNA |
Oncorhynchus mykiss
 |
unclassified |
source_name:LS47 REFERENCE title:LS47F description:The fish used in the study were sexually immature, mixed sex, adult rainbow trout from two lines of fish selectively bred for either a high (HR) or low (LR) corticosteroid response to a standardized confinement stressor. The selection programme used to generate the HR and LR lines of trout has been described previously (Pottinger and Carrick, 1999 and 2001). In brief, single parent matings of individuals identified as either HR or LR by their corticosteroid response to a series of standardized confinement stressors were used to generate F1 lines of HR and LR progeny. An individual-within-family selection process was adopted to establish the F2 and subsequently the F3 generation, used in this study. The F3 generation hatched during spring 2003 and these fish were therefore in their second year (18 months old) at the time of this study. The mean weight and fork length of the two lines at the time of the study was LR: 181 g, 24.7 cm; HR: 185 g, 24.9 cm. |
| 14 |
GSM624405 |
LS45R |
11,088 |
NUI Galway |
2010-11-17 |
[Oligo Array] Aquafirst_Trout (GPL11206) |
RNA |
Oncorhynchus mykiss
 |
unclassified |
source_name:REFERENCE LS45 title:LS45R description:The fish used in the study were sexually immature, mixed sex, adult rainbow trout from two lines of fish selectively bred for either a high (HR) or low (LR) corticosteroid response to a standardized confinement stressor. The selection programme used to generate the HR and LR lines of trout has been described previously (Pottinger and Carrick, 1999 and 2001). In brief, single parent matings of individuals identified as either HR or LR by their corticosteroid response to a series of standardized confinement stressors were used to generate F1 lines of HR and LR progeny. An individual-within-family selection process was adopted to establish the F2 and subsequently the F3 generation, used in this study. The F3 generation hatched during spring 2003 and these fish were therefore in their second year (18 months old) at the time of this study. The mean weight and fork length of the two lines at the time of the study was LR: 181 g, 24.7 cm; HR: 185 g, 24.9 cm. |
| 15 |
GSM624404 |
LS45F |
11,088 |
NUI Galway |
2010-11-17 |
[Oligo Array] Aquafirst_Trout (GPL11206) |
RNA |
Oncorhynchus mykiss
 |
unclassified |
source_name:LS45 REFERENCE title:LS45F description:The fish used in the study were sexually immature, mixed sex, adult rainbow trout from two lines of fish selectively bred for either a high (HR) or low (LR) corticosteroid response to a standardized confinement stressor. The selection programme used to generate the HR and LR lines of trout has been described previously (Pottinger and Carrick, 1999 and 2001). In brief, single parent matings of individuals identified as either HR or LR by their corticosteroid response to a series of standardized confinement stressors were used to generate F1 lines of HR and LR progeny. An individual-within-family selection process was adopted to establish the F2 and subsequently the F3 generation, used in this study. The F3 generation hatched during spring 2003 and these fish were therefore in their second year (18 months old) at the time of this study. The mean weight and fork length of the two lines at the time of the study was LR: 181 g, 24.7 cm; HR: 185 g, 24.9 cm. |
| 16 |
GSM624403 |
LS44R |
11,088 |
NUI Galway |
2010-11-17 |
[Oligo Array] Aquafirst_Trout (GPL11206) |
RNA |
Oncorhynchus mykiss
 |
unclassified |
source_name:REFERENCE LS44 title:LS44R description:The fish used in the study were sexually immature, mixed sex, adult rainbow trout from two lines of fish selectively bred for either a high (HR) or low (LR) corticosteroid response to a standardized confinement stressor. The selection programme used to generate the HR and LR lines of trout has been described previously (Pottinger and Carrick, 1999 and 2001). In brief, single parent matings of individuals identified as either HR or LR by their corticosteroid response to a series of standardized confinement stressors were used to generate F1 lines of HR and LR progeny. An individual-within-family selection process was adopted to establish the F2 and subsequently the F3 generation, used in this study. The F3 generation hatched during spring 2003 and these fish were therefore in their second year (18 months old) at the time of this study. The mean weight and fork length of the two lines at the time of the study was LR: 181 g, 24.7 cm; HR: 185 g, 24.9 cm. |
| 17 |
GSM624402 |
LS44F |
11,088 |
NUI Galway |
2010-11-17 |
[Oligo Array] Aquafirst_Trout (GPL11206) |
RNA |
Oncorhynchus mykiss
 |
unclassified |
source_name:LS44 REFERENCE title:LS44F description:The fish used in the study were sexually immature, mixed sex, adult rainbow trout from two lines of fish selectively bred for either a high (HR) or low (LR) corticosteroid response to a standardized confinement stressor. The selection programme used to generate the HR and LR lines of trout has been described previously (Pottinger and Carrick, 1999 and 2001). In brief, single parent matings of individuals identified as either HR or LR by their corticosteroid response to a series of standardized confinement stressors were used to generate F1 lines of HR and LR progeny. An individual-within-family selection process was adopted to establish the F2 and subsequently the F3 generation, used in this study. The F3 generation hatched during spring 2003 and these fish were therefore in their second year (18 months old) at the time of this study. The mean weight and fork length of the two lines at the time of the study was LR: 181 g, 24.7 cm; HR: 185 g, 24.9 cm. |
| 18 |
GSM624401 |
LS43R |
11,088 |
NUI Galway |
2010-11-17 |
[Oligo Array] Aquafirst_Trout (GPL11206) |
RNA |
Oncorhynchus mykiss
 |
unclassified |
source_name:REFERENCE LS43 title:LS43R description:The fish used in the study were sexually immature, mixed sex, adult rainbow trout from two lines of fish selectively bred for either a high (HR) or low (LR) corticosteroid response to a standardized confinement stressor. The selection programme used to generate the HR and LR lines of trout has been described previously (Pottinger and Carrick, 1999 and 2001). In brief, single parent matings of individuals identified as either HR or LR by their corticosteroid response to a series of standardized confinement stressors were used to generate F1 lines of HR and LR progeny. An individual-within-family selection process was adopted to establish the F2 and subsequently the F3 generation, used in this study. The F3 generation hatched during spring 2003 and these fish were therefore in their second year (18 months old) at the time of this study. The mean weight and fork length of the two lines at the time of the study was LR: 181 g, 24.7 cm; HR: 185 g, 24.9 cm. |
| 19 |
GSM624400 |
LS43F |
11,088 |
NUI Galway |
2010-11-17 |
[Oligo Array] Aquafirst_Trout (GPL11206) |
RNA |
Oncorhynchus mykiss
 |
unclassified |
source_name:LS43 REFERENCE title:LS43F description:The fish used in the study were sexually immature, mixed sex, adult rainbow trout from two lines of fish selectively bred for either a high (HR) or low (LR) corticosteroid response to a standardized confinement stressor. The selection programme used to generate the HR and LR lines of trout has been described previously (Pottinger and Carrick, 1999 and 2001). In brief, single parent matings of individuals identified as either HR or LR by their corticosteroid response to a series of standardized confinement stressors were used to generate F1 lines of HR and LR progeny. An individual-within-family selection process was adopted to establish the F2 and subsequently the F3 generation, used in this study. The F3 generation hatched during spring 2003 and these fish were therefore in their second year (18 months old) at the time of this study. The mean weight and fork length of the two lines at the time of the study was LR: 181 g, 24.7 cm; HR: 185 g, 24.9 cm. |
| 20 |
GSM625913 |
Liver confinement timecourse LS6L vs LS24L |
11,088 |
NUI Galway |
2010-11-18 |
[Oligo Array] Aquafirst_Trout (GPL11206) |
RNA |
Oncorhynchus mykiss
 |
liver/hepato |
Liver confinement timecourse LS6L vs LS24L |